How VisaPro Helped: A Well-Known Country Club Successfully Win H2B Program DOL Advertisement Challenges

The Immigration Problem

When Company H, a well-known country club, filed the ETA Form 9141 to hire workers on H2B, the DOL issued a Request for Information (RFI) alleging a qualified U.S. worker was unlawfully rejected, giving Company H only seven (7) calendar days to correct the application and recruitment report, if necessary, and draft a response!

The Result

VisaPro helped Company H timely file a revised H2B Recruitment Report and tackle issues about terms and conditions of employment and whether U.S. workers were treated unfairly. Less than a week after the response was submitted, the DOL approved the H2B labor certification.

Inquiry Into The Background

Company H, as it had done in the past, conducted bona fide recruitment in order to find qualified individuals to work at the club.

According to the original Recruitment Report submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL), the employer properly and lawfully screened all applicants. Out of 24 applicants, Company H hired 4 U.S. workers. According to the original H2B Recruitment Report submitted to DOL, however, it appeared only 3 U.S. applicants were hired. According to the original Recruitment Report, 1 U.S. candidate, Mr. R, was qualified for the job and but was not hired because he did not pass a drug-screening exam.

Upon submission of the ETA Form 9141, the DOL issued a Request for Information (RFI) alleging that

  • a qualified U.S. worker was unlawfully rejected, and
  • an important term or condition of employment (namely, the ability to pass a drug-screen exam) was not included in the advertisements for the position.

The DOL also wanted Company H to prove that U.S. workers were not treated any less favorably through the enforcement of a drug-test requirement.

And, as with all RFI’s from the DOL, the employer was given only seven (7) calendar days to correct the application and recruitment report, if necessary, and draft a response!

About The H2B Visa Process

Country clubs, hotels and resorts all over the U.S. rely on the hard work of thousands of non-agricultural nonimmigrant temporary workers from all over the world. While the H2B program was designed specifically for employers who need non-agricultural workers to come to their establishment to work on a temporary basis due to a seasonal, short-term or intermittent need, obtaining the visa is harder than it seems.

As with most employment-based nonimmigrant visas, the H2B application process requires the H2B visa sponsors to submit a petition to USCIS. Before submitting an H2B petition to USCIS, however, H2B sponsoring companies must obtain a valid labor certification (ETA Form 9141) from the Department of Labor.

By submitting the H2B labor certification, the employer is verifying that there are no U.S. workers who are willing, able, and qualified to do the job required.

H2B visa employers must conduct bona fide recruitment and document the recruitment with specificity. H2B visa employers must show that each and every U.S. worker that applies is not qualified. If a qualified U.S. worker applies for the job, then the applicant may only be rejected for a lawful job-related reason or must be hired.

Analysis Of The Problem

When VisaPro reviewed the RFI and spoke with Company H, we realized that no U.S. workers were unlawfully rejected. Mr. R had not only been offered the position, but had actually been hired and had worked for two weeks. He was, however, let go from the company because he failed to a pass a drug screening after being hired. Mr. R had in fact been hired but was almost immediately let go because he failed the drug-screening exam.

Company H did not truly understand the importance of what they thought was an inconsequential piece of information. In attempting to simplify the process, Company H failed to include pertinent information regarding Mr. R in their H2B Recruitment Report or inform us, their attorneys.

Check My Eligibility

VisaPro’s Successful Solution

VisaPro’s approach to the H2B RFE was multi-faceted.

1. First, we had the employer clear the record by explaining to the DOL that Mr. R was indeed hired, and not simply offered the position and disqualified because he failed a drug screen. A revised H2B Recruitment Report was submitted showing the correct information as well as copies of Mr. R’s pay stubs to show that he had indeed been hired.

2. Next, we tackled the issue about the “terms and conditions of employment” and whether U.S. workers were treated unfairly. The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals or BALCA, which handles DOL review cases, had never addressed “the terms and conditions of employment” in the H2B context. However, BALCA had addressed “terms and conditions of employment” in the context of the permanent labor certification process.

After thoroughly reviewing the company’s Employee Handbook and other company policies as well as industry standards and bringing in our vast experience with both the ETA Form 9141 and permanent labor certifications, we drafted a well-thought out and thorough explanation.

  1. We had the employer explain that that maintaining a drug-free environment was an integral piece of this company’s business model and that all workers, regardless of their immigration status or position within the company, were expected to be drug-free at all times.
  2. We had the employer explain that it would be onerous and grossly unfair to require any company to list each and every requirement of a job in the advertisement. For example, the employer would not need to state in the advertisement that all employees must wear a uniform while they are working even though a violation of this requirement may lead to the employee being fired. While this seems to be a condition of employment, the regulations do not require it to be listed.
  3. Furthermore, even if the DOL felt that a drug screen test was truly a term or condition of employment that was important enough to be listed, we were able to distinguish between a job requirement that is a “condition” of employment and that which is required for “maintenance” of employment.
  4. By arguing that the employee was fired because he failed to pass a routine drug screening as opposed to not being hired for failing a drug screening, we showed that the employee failed to maintain employment.


Less than a week after the response was submitted, the DOL approved the H2B labor certification.

By combining a detailed understanding of the labor certification process with a down-to-earth common sense approach, we were able to convince the DOL that

  • the employer had made an inadvertent but non-fatal error on the H2B Recruitment Report; and more importantly,
  • the employer’s recruitment was not flawed because it may have not listed each and every requirement of the job in the job advertisement.

If you have a complicated case VisaPro experienced immigration attorneys can help you with the process. Contact VisaPro Immigration Lawyers to review your situation and discuss your options.

Click here to add a comment

What VisaPro Customers Are Saying

Knowledgeable, fast, courteous, efficient are all words that describe the services I received from VisaPro. They were very helpful in all phases of the H-1B visa process and they got it right the first time. I have tried other Visa services, but VisaPro is the best by far. VisaPro is the only way to go!"

Get a Free Visa Assessment

Trust Symbol